|
|
In "Differential Perspectives: Epistemic
Disconnects Surrounding the US Census Bureau's Use of Differential
Privacy," boyd and Sarathy argue that empirical evaluations of the
Census Disclosure Avoidance System (DAS), including our published analysis, failed to
recognize how the benchmark data against which the 2020 DAS was
evaluated is never a ground truth of population counts. In this
commentary, we explain why policy evaluation, which was the main
goal of our analysis, is still meaningful without access to a
perfect ground truth. We also point out that our evaluation
leveraged features specific to the decennial Census and
redistricting data, such as block-level population invariance under
swapping and voter file racial identification, better approximating
a comparison with the ground truth. Lastly, we show that accurate
statistical predictions of individual race based on the Bayesian
Improved Surname Geocoding, while not a violation of differential
privacy, substantially increases the disclosure risk of private
information the Census Bureau sought to protect. We conclude by
arguing that policy makers must confront a key trade-off between
data utility and privacy protection, and an epistemic disconnect
alone is insufficient to explain disagreements between policy
choices. |
Kenny, Christopher, Cory McCartan, Shiro
Kuriwaki, Tyler Simko, and Kosuke Imai. (2024). ``Evaluating Bias and Noise Induced by the
U.S. Census Bureau's Privacy Protection Methods.''
Science Advances, Vol 10, No. 18 (May),
pp. 1-13. |
McCartan, Cory, Tyler Simko, and Kosuke
Imai. (2023). ``Making Differential
Privacy Work for Census Data Users.'' Harvard Data Science
Review, Vol. 5, No. 4 (Fall).
|
Kenny, Christopher, Cory McCartan, Tyler
Simko, and Kosuke Imai. (2024). ``Census officials must
constructively engage with independent evaluations.''
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (Letter),
Vol. 121, No. 11, e2321196121. |
Kenny, Christopher T., Shiro Kuriwaki, Cory
McCartan, Evan Rosenman, Tyler Simko, and Kosuke
Imai. ``The Use of Differential Privacy
for Census Data and its Impact on Redistricting: The Case of the
2020 U.S. Census..'' Science Advances,
Vol. 7, No. 7 (October), pp. 1-17. |