Abstract

In “Differential Perspectives: Epistemic Disconnects Surrounding the US Census Bureau’s Use of Differential Privacy,” boyd and Sarathy argue that empirical evaluations of the Census Disclosure Avoidance System (DAS), including our published analysis , failed to recognize how the benchmark data against which the 2020 DAS was evaluated is never a ground truth of population counts. In this commentary, we explain why policy evaluation, which was the main goal of our analysis, is still meaningful without access to a perfect ground truth. We also point out that our evaluation leveraged features specific to the decennial Census and redistricting data, such as block-level population invariance under swapping and voter file racial identification, better approximating a comparison with the ground truth. Lastly, we show that accurate statistical predictions of individual race based on the Bayesian Improved Surname Geocoding, while not a violation of differential privacy, substantially increases the disclosure risk of private information the Census Bureau sought to protect. We conclude by arguing that policy makers must confront a key trade-off between data utility and privacy protection, and an epistemic disconnect alone is insufficient to explain disagreements between policy choices.

Related Papers

McCartan, Cory, Christopher Kenny, Tyler Simko, Emma Ebowe, Michael Zhao, and Kosuke Imai ``Redistricting Reforms Reduce Gerrymandering by Constraining Partisan Actors.'' American Political Science Review, Forthcoming.

Kenny, Christopher T., Brian Zhou, Tyler Simko, and Kosuke Imai (2026). ``Weakening the Voting Rights Act reduces minority representation and electoral competition.''

O'Sullivan, Philip, Kosuke Imai, and Cory McCartan (2026). ``Generalized Sequential Monte Carlo Sampling for Redistricting Simulation.''

Miyazaki, Sho, Kento Yamada, and Kosuke Imai (2025). ``Estimating the Partisan Bias of Japanese Legislative Redistricting Plans Using a Simulation Algorithm.''

Jasny, Ethan, Christopher T. Kenny, Cory McCartan, Tyler Simko, Melissa Wu, Michael Y. Zhao, Aneetej Arora, Emma Ebowe, Philip O'Sullivan, Taran Samarth, and Kosuke Imai (2025). ``Gerrymandering and geographic polarization have reduced electoral competition.''

McCartan, Cory and Kosuke Imai (2023). ``Sequential Monte Carlo for Sampling Balanced and Compact Redistricting Plans.'' Annals of Applied Statistics, Vol. 17, No. 4 (December), pp. 3300-3323.

Kenny, Christopher T., Cory McCartan, Tyler Simko, Shiro Kuriwaki, and Kosuke Imai (2023). ``Widespread Partisan Gerrymandering Mostly Cancels Nationally, but Reduces Electoral Competition.'' Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Vol. 120, No. 25, e2217322120.

McCartan, Cory, Christopher T. Kenny, Tyler Simko, George Garcia III, Kevin Wang, Melissa Wu, Shiro Kuriwaki, and Kosuke Imai (2022). ``Simulated redistricting plans for the analysis and evaluation of redistricting in the United States.'' Scientific Data, Vol. 9, No. 689, pp. 1-10.

Kenny, Christopher T., Shiro Kuriwaki, Cory McCartan, Evan T.R. Rosenman, Tyler Simko, and Kosuke Imai (2021). ``The Use of Differential Privacy for Census Data and its Impact on Redistricting: The Case of the 2020 U.S. Census.'' Science Advances, Vol. 7, No. 7 (October), pp. 1-17.

Fifield, Benjamin, Kosuke Imai, Jun Kawahara, and Christopher T. Kenny (2020). ``The Essential Role of Empirical Validation in Legislative Redistricting Simulation.'' Statistics and Public Policy, Vol. 7, No. 1, pp 52-68.

Fifield, Benjamin, Michael Higgins, Kosuke Imai, and Alexander Tarr (2020). ``Automated Redistricting Simulation Using Markov Chain Monte Carlo.'' Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 715-728.